The Root Cause Of Cancer and Why Has it Been Kept a Secret! turmeric_cancer

The Nobel Prize winner, Dr. Otto H. Warburg, had devoted his life to the study of and cause of cancer.

Dr. Warburg was one of the 20th centuries leading biologists, and he discovered that the root cause of cancer is too much acidity in the body, meaning that the pH in the body is below the normal level of 7.365, which constitutes an “acidic” state. Warburg investigated the metabolism of tumours and the respiration of cells and discovered that cancer cells maintain and thrive in a lower pH, as low as 6.0, due to lactic acid production and elevated CO2. He firmly believed that there was a direct relationship between pH and oxygen. Higher pH, which is Alkaline, means higher concentration of oxygen molecules, while lower pH, which is acidic, means lower concentrations of oxygen…the same oxygen that is needed to maintain healthy cells.

In 1931 Dr. Warburg was awarded the Nobel Prize in Medicine for this important discovery. He stated, “Cancerous tissues are acidic, whereas healthy tissues are alkaline. Water splits into H+ and OH- ions, if there is and excess of H+, it is acidic; if there is an excess of OH- ions, then it is alkaline”.

In his work The Metabolism of Tumours Warburg demonstrated that “all forms of cancer are characterized by two basic conditions: acidosis and hypoxia (lack of oxygen). Lack of oxygen and acidosis are two sides of the same coin: where you have one, you have the other.” “All normal cells have an absolute requirement for oxygen, but cancer cells can live without oxygen – a rule without exception. Deprive a cell 35% of its oxygen for 48 hours and it may become cancerous.”

Dr. Warburg has made it clear that the root cause of cancer is oxygen deficiency, which creates an acidic state in the human body. Dr. Warburg also discovered that cancer cells are anaerobic (do not breathe oxygen) and cannot survive in the presence of high levels of oxygen, as found in an alkaline state.

German Scientists Prove There is Life After Death

Berlin| A team of psychologists and medical doctors associated with the Technische Universität of Berlin, have announced this morning that they had proven by clinical experimentation, the existence of some form of life after death. This astonishing announcement is based on the conclusions of a study using a new type of medically supervised near-death experiences, that allow patients to be clinically dead for almost 20 minutes before being brought back to life.

This controversial process that was repeated on 944 volunteers over that last four years, necessitates a complex mixture of drugs including epinephrine and dimethyltryptamine, destined to allow the body to survive the state of clinical death and the reanimation process without damage. The body of the subject was then put into a temporary comatic state induced by a mixture of other drugs which had to be filtered by ozone from his blood during the reanimation process 18 minutes later.

The extremely long duration of the experience was only recently made possible by the development of a new cardiopulmonary recitation (CPR) machine called the AutoPulse. This type of equipment has already been used over the last few years, to reanimate people who had been dead for somewhere between 40 minutes to an hour.

– See more at: http://worldnewsdailyreport.com/german-scientists-prove-there-is-life-after-death/#sthash.ReBnTy9j.dpuf

The team of scientists led by Dr Berthold Ackermann, has monitored the operations and have compiled the testimonies of the subjects. Although there are some slight variations from one individual to another, all of the subjects have some memories of their period of clinical death. and a vast majority of them described some very similar sensations.

Most common memories include a feeling of detachment from the body, feelings of levitation, total serenity, security, warmth, the experience of absolute dissolution, and the presence of an overwhelming light.

The scientists say that they are well aware the many of their conclusions could shock a lot of people, like the fact that the religious beliefs of the various subjects seems to have held no incidence at all, on the sensations and experiences that they described at the end of the experiment. Indeed, the volunteers counted in their ranks some members are a variety of Christian churches, Muslims, Jews, Hindus and atheists.

“I know our results could disturb the beliefs of many people” says Mr Ackermann. “But in a way, we have just answered one of the greatest questions in the history of mankind, so I hope these people will be able to forgive us. Yes, there is life after death and it looks like this applies to everyone.”

– See more at: http://worldnewsdailyreport.com/german-scientists-prove-there-is-life-after-death/#sthash.ReBnTy9j.dpuf

The Coming War for Ukraine

The XX Committee

As I write, Russian forces, reportedly close to 100,000 troops, are massing on the eastern borders of Ukraine for a possible invasion. The Kremlin is either about to start a major war, or wants the world to think it is: there is no third choice now. Given the scheduled referendum in the Crimea this Sunday, smart money has it that Putin, if he really launches an all-out push for Ukraine – which, as I’ve already explained, could be a disastrous move on his part – it will come early next week. Needless to add, this scenario brings chills to me and to anyone who understands the stakes in what would immediately be the biggest European war since 1945.

Yet that invasion, with its terrible consequences, is what many in Ukraine now expect. That mood of resignation, and what a Russian invasion might look like, are elaborated well in a new…

View original post 1,662 more words

WTF? What the Fukushima?! Dr. Patrick Flanagan

2012 The Awakening

WFT? CNN broke the historic WHAT THE FUKUSHIMA? news today 8.31.13. We immediately began producing this video, where scientist Patrick Flanagan tells us that Fukushima is far worse than we’ve all been led to believe.

http://phisciences.com founder Patrick Flanagan says it’s even worse that CNN has reported, a horrific equivalent of radiation equal to 10 Hiroshima’s an hour 24/7 has been pumped into seas for since 3.11.13. That’s equal to about 8,700 Hiroshima’s.

Link to the LIFE MAGAZINE story on the young doctor Flanagan. http://phisciences.com/patricks-life-…

Is it any wonder our world is dying? What the Fukushima?!

Video from director Ken Sheetz http://buzzbroz.com

See Ken’s meditations for a better world at http://dreamshield.org

The CNN story the world can be grateful for. http://globalpublicsquare.blogs.cnn.c…

Songs used are licensed for our exclusive worldwide use in connection with his video.

TRAGIC CONSEQUENCE: http://www.videoblocks.com/videos/det…

LONELY LOVE STORY http://www.videoblocks.com/videos/det…

All still and A bomb footage used under…

View original post 7 more words

I don’t know from which lecture of LRH this excerpt is. If anyone knows let me know.

Now, oddly enough, Man, when he works as a team, must have policy or he is not a team. He cannot work as a team without policy, so all he works as is a bunch of individuals. Even bad policy, you see, will at least make a team out of him. … Any policy is better than no policy because that is what makes the team. It’s simply the agreement. It’s the extant agreement, and if there isn’t an extant agreement, then you have individualized action.

The worst team you ever wanted to see is one composed of ‘all stars’ taken at random as the starring players, with spectacular individualities from each of the winning teams of a country. I don’t care what game you’re playing, if you want a really stinking team, get those boys, because they’re running according to the different policies of their different coaches, don’t you see? And they are already, by ‘all star’ players, preselected as doing something that was very noticeable, which means they didn’t even follow their own team policy. So now you group all these fellows together in a mess, and each one – each one is magnificent and a collective mess. And they probably could be licked by any little batch of high-school kids on the same game, who were welded together by policy. ‘When Bill does that, I do this. That’s it. That’s play sixty-four. What’s play sixty-four? Well, when Bill does that, I do this and then Joe does that.’ That’s just policy.

So we in Scientology, compared to the world’s population, are a relatively small group. We tend to be a lot of ruddy individualists, which is fine in our private life, but our organizational actions must be coordinated. And if we knitted together our organizational actions and our functions across the world, and we had a good similarity of action, good duplication from organization to organization, and then we grooved this in and put this together very nicely … Who else on this planet is following policy? Nobody.

And oddly enough, I have traced every single blowup we’ve had back to a wild departure from policy – very simple, primary, known policy.

Melbourne blew up on the refund policy. They just didn’t follow any part of the refund policy. That’s rather incredible. Our policy is when somebody  – somebody isn’t satisfied and so forth and wants his money back, we promptly give him his money back. We also tell him, ‘Well, you’re through with Scientology’. … And that’s been policy since heck was a pup. And Melbourne didn’t give the man his money back. No-o-o. And when they did give him his money back, they didn’t follow the rest of the policy. They didn’t get a quitclaim from him. So he turned right around and sued them. They gave his money back and he sued them. Pure idiocy.

That’s where they come a cropper, you see? They are not part of the team. And you will find all the symptoms of individuation present, which is they yammer at the other teams, see? They cuss the other teams out. They’re always getting ARC broke about the other teams, do you see? And they just individuate more and more and more and follow policy less and less and less and all of a sudden they aren’t there anymore, unless somebody intervenes with heavy cavalry.

Now, if we’re going to make our forward progress – we have a lot of good organizations through the world, of which Melbourne is one of them now. (I have now acked them.) The situation is that these are placed in rather strategic areas. They’re placed in strategic areas to spread a sphere of influence.

And when those spheres of influence meet on their own borders, we don’t want them to be different and create a ridge; we want them just to flow smoothly out and meet. You follow? It’s all rigged to do so.

Now therefore, if we are a good team, and if we watch our individual cases, and we come right on up the line as people, as beings, and we also are part of the team, then we won’t get into all the trouble we got into as roaring, screaming individuals way back on the track. In other words, we can make it all the way because we’ve kept order all the way.

VITAL DATA ON PROMOTION

HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE

Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex

HCO POLICY LETTER OF 21 JANUARY 1965

REVISED 5 APRIL 1965

 

Gen Non Remimeo

Sthil Board

Members

Sthil Executives 

 

VITAL DATA ON PROMOTION

 

Successful orgs, good dissemination, a salvaged planet, require the following basic things:

1. Workable Technology. This means something to offer that is desirable and will be received by individuals in the public body.

2. Good execution of the technology. This means holding a constant of application without variation in how it is done from person to person or place to place. This outlaws at once all squirrelling and individual variations even when they are good for they bring about an inconstant of execution and this can wipe out technology, leaving one with nothing to promote and a dead end of all spread of technology. Hence, no articles in magazines giving different points of view. Hence, no officially authorized books giving variant methods. Even if they were good, it would halt all promotion and end freedom for the planet.

3. Accumulation of the identities of persons. This is done by getting lists of names, by personal contact, etc. But however it is done, it is totally the accumulation of identities.

4. Offering those identities something they will buy, a book or a service.

5. Delivering what is offered.

That is all there is to successful promotion. There are a thousand ways to do (3) the accumulation of the identities of persons and (4) offering these identities something they will buy, so

promotion looks complex. It is not.

Successful promotion means continuing. One cannot continue to promote as per (3) accumulation of the identities of persons, and (4) offering these identities something they will buy,

unless (1) workable technology, (2) good execution of the technology, and (5) delivering what is offered, are in place.

However, (1) workable technology, (2) good execution of the technology and (5) delivering what is offered, can be wholly in place without any world beating a path to the better mousetrap maker.

By the nature of the bank, collective opinion is always derogatory or bank, this being the one thing held in common by all. So the group ignores the good and embraces the bad. Thus the appeal must be to the individual for his personal use. And even then one always has to do (3) accumulation of the identities of persons, and (4) offering those identities something they will buy. No matter how good (1) workable technology, (2) good execution of the technology and (5) delivering what is offered, are, (3)

accumulation of the identities of persons, and (4) offering those identities something they will buy, must always be vigorously executed continually. There is no coasting along on yesterday’s steam. All tomorrows require today’s heavy promotion.

We call (1) Technology, (2) Good Service and (5) Ethics. We call (3) Dissemination and (4) Salesmanship. (3) Dissemination and (4) Salesmanship are really promotion. But all five must exist for

promotion to be successful.

So that is all there is to promotion.

One contacts people by any media including word of mouth, ads, rumors, etc. In (3) Dissemination, it is enough to accumulate names and addresses of persons who have been contacted.

In (4) Salesmanship, one effectively offers these individuals something they can and will buy-service, status increased potential, anything they will buy.

In (5) Ethics, one delivers what is offered.

If you just remember that’s all there is to promotion, you will be very successful.

Therefore you:

(a)Never seek public or group repute or collective bank. You do not do “good will” advertising or just try to get the name about. You only accumulate identities as per (3) Dissemination and

use them for (4) Salesmanship offering them something they will buy.

(b) Never count on an individual to “spread the word if he experiences a miracle” as you can always contact more people than he can.

 (c)Never via your comm line heavily through a “powerful person” or “authoritative group” as

you can promote better directly.

(d) Never seek a subsidy for what you are doing as at once you or any subsidized office will.

cease to promote to the public individuals. You throw out anything or anyone who is working to make you get a subsidy or who demands a subsidy to operate an office, as there goes your public contact. It ceases to have point as there’s no dependence on the public individual so he ceases to be served. Subsidy is a fine way to. fail and always leads to a dead end. A subsidized office ceases to promote as it no longer depends on doing (3) Dissemination -accumulation of the identities of persons, and (4) Salesmanship- offering those identities something they will buy, for its daily bread. So it is useless in the scheme of things and, not serving, becomes dangerous.

If you don’t promote, the whole effort will dead end, the individual will no longer be reached, the group bank reaction will set in and that’s the end of it.

Inadequate promotion, not reaching the individual, and any violation of (5) Ethics -delivering what is offered, are the sources of all the difficulties we have experienced.

Therefore adequate promotion, reaching the individual and making sure of (5) delivering what is offered, will be responsible for all the successes we will experience in the future.

It is as simple as that.

When you hear proposals to reduce mailing lists, know somebody is trying to kill you. 

When you see something being offered that the individual cannot buy, know that somebody is being silly.

When you see lists of people being collected who will not buy, know somebody is being extravagant.

Err on the side of too many names accumulated, however, and burn the midnight oil figuring out what they can and will buy, that you can deliver. Sell it for enough to let you keep on promoting and soon you’ll have the planet.

ORGANIZATION

The Earth measure of success is the amount of power, authority, people, wealth and property one controls.

It is not necessary to bank it to your own name if you can dictate its expenditure.

The reason we are interested in success of this kind is because it is the wherewithal to reach and get the job done. Without that, these things, except for people, are trash.

It is all very well to idealize poverty and associate wisdom with begging bowls, or virtue with low estate. However, those who have done this (Buddhists, Christians, Communists and other fanatics) have dead ended or are dead ending. That route doesn’t get the job done so it can’t be a workable route.

The hard fact of this civilization is, given enough money or control, you can usually buy or demand your way out of any game you don’t want to play. Thus you can keep on playing the game you do want to play. It is always a matter of amusement to me to find out some attacker is after money. For that’s an easy one.

To keep going on a planetary salvage job you have to have the means to salvage in the frame of reference of the planet. Hence, we need the above things to get the job done.

Therefore you have to have an organization. This makes it easy to handle the activities needful for salvage and to acquire or control the wherewithal to continue to salvage.

Without power, authority, people, wealth and property you cannot make enough impact at the level of reality of the individuals you are seeking to salvage.

If you only wanted salvage for one or two, then none of these would be needed in any vast amount. But large numbers being salvaged require organization. And organization requires the other

things to keep operating and remain real.

 

You can therefore know your enemies by those who seek to knock out any part of your

(a) Power (b) Authority (c) Personnel (d) Wealth (e) Property.

As collective-think demands that these items particularly be knocked out, handling and continuing an organization is a rather arduous activity.

The individual is the effect of these items, however, so if one can maintain them, one wins.

One forms an organization only in order to do (1) workable technology, (2) good execution of the technology, (3) accumulate the identities of persons, (4) offer those identities something they will buy, (5) deliver what is offered, under Promotion.

Because of the character of the bank and collective think, number (1) workable technology, under Promotion, is not possible to achieve by an organization or group. Group research is not merely

too expensive, it is also only re-search of the work generated by an individual. New ideas never appear in group research so it merely polishes at best (and messes up at worst) what has already been done technically by an individual.

Therefore organization begins at (2) good execution of the technology, exists to do (3) accumulation of the identities of persons, and (5) deliver what is offered. (4) Salesmanship- offering those identities something they will buy, again is usually the work of an individual thinking up ideas and offerings.

Therefore the central control point of an activity puts an organization there to do (2) good execution of the technology, (3) accumulation of the identities of persons, and (5) delivering what is offered, and works individually to find new ways to do (3) accumulation of the identities of persons, and originates (4) offering those identities something they will buy.

Thus a central control point has a dual engagement-(a) To put and keep the broad organization there to do (2) good execution of the technology, (3) accumulation of the identities of persons, and (5)

delivering what is offered, and (b) to originate better ways to do (3) accumulation of the identities of persons, and new ways to do (4) offering those identities something they will buy.

Thus the relation of a central control point to the organization is very easy to understand.

The hardest work consists of keeping the organization from going banky and not doing (2) good execution of the technology, (3) accumulation of the identities of persons and (5) delivering what is offered. The most brilliant work consists of better ways to do (3) accumulation of identities of persons, and effective things for (4) offering those identities something they will buy.

This is the totality of action by a central control point. If done well, the whole organization achieves the final objective and if done badly the whole thing dead ends.

Great pressures exist against a central control point to violate its needs for (a) Power (b) Authority (c) Personnel (d) Wealth and (e) Property under Organization above, and it is easy to surrender without realizing that surrender is fatal in our case to every one on this planet and perhaps ourselves as well.

Resist these pressures successfully and the central control point then can do (2) good execution of the technology (3) accumulation of the identities of persons (4) offering those identities something

they will buy, and (5) delivering what is offered, and everybody wins.

And that’s all there is to organization.

LRH:mb.rd L. RON HUBBARD

Copyright © 1965 by

L. Ron Hubbard

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

[The original title of this Policy Letter was PROMOTION AND ORGANIZATION FROM A CENTRAL CONTROL VIEWPOINT –

THE FUNDAMENTALS OF PROMOTION. The 5 April 1965 revised issue, VITAL DATA ON PROMOTION (above), expands it.